tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3626948142271204254.post6031031086372580656..comments2023-09-16T13:59:34.933+01:00Comments on Vagrant in the Casual Ward of a Workhouse: Great ExpectorationsGary Paul Dukehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17324318621702826617noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3626948142271204254.post-42323336959655185172011-05-30T22:18:30.637+01:002011-05-30T22:18:30.637+01:00It is impossible for there to be a sustained charg...It is impossible for there to be a sustained charge of harassment for posting a blog or website critical of a university or its officials. In the case of R v Fredrics, DJ Kreiman ruling from the bench of the Kingston Magistrates Court said that harassment laws were not intended to protect individual reputations. On this basis, DJ Kreiman found 'no case to answer.'<br /><br />Harassment requires an approach, either through a direct email, written or in person contact. Posting a blog/website requires that the individual(s) go out of their way to visit such a site in order to be "harassed." That goes counter to the very meaning of the term.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com